This is part two of my photo essay of the Dutch National Park the Veluwe. The first part with all digital images is here. I guess if you have seen that post you will see some similar images here, but film definitely has its own character. And since I used three different types, you see a variety of looks in this post. I shot Kodak Ektar, Fuji Velvia 100 and Adox Silvermax, and developed all film myself.
Day one:
As I didn’t bring a tripod on the first day I only shot with wide-open aperture. They’re still not super-sharp, but I like them none-the less. Oh, and what looks like fog in the first photo is actually rain 🙂 .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f182/2f182f1fffb9fdcc5a8da6ba623c4aec1b4c0349" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcff0/fcff0597e43fe357082a014318b3b4f2aa40b253" alt=""
Day two:
The second day started out with rain, but pretty soon the sun came through.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6e4c/a6e4ccbe06162bcee4ffaa7ebe054834a7ea9b77" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a965/3a96580ac5b13b5681ff5433b239f1a97178379d" alt=""
Day three:
The third day started with Velvia 100, and a lot of sun. The high contrast scenes are a challenge for slide, but the colors of the heather are spectacular. So I actually don’t mind the blown-out sky…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fca45/fca45ee4b3fcdf1dd302cbc7edd1ce7d3b491b31" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ede19/ede19b4314254f0a77aff9c14f86ce60f95676a2" alt=""
Day four:
This was a bit of a dreary day, and I didn’t like most of what I shot. But I did like the raindrops on the leaves below, although I had to crop the image to make it interesting enough. And it’s a different look from Velvia, as I usually shoot slide in the sun.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52c47/52c478a7e7851cd273de783c298bf7801c041547" alt=""
Day five:
Day five made up for day four! I couldn’t resist adding a few extra photos here. I finished a roll of velvia first, and reloaded the M2 with Ektar. Both work well with the foggy conditions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab549/ab54974aef4573a1680f2cad8043ee5276d22696" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc194/dc19473496b5b4731870a7f86eaade957292d3e3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20030/2003017ba1094b55cf9a5d771b42d6807b2fe4bf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7302e/7302ef3f1c6b48c40222469a0a57767dfc1c2607" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24047/240474231dac99320046da77607bc89b254f52c0" alt=""
Day six:
A hazy day with flat light, but I liked the shape of the little conifer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63712/63712706193e46fd2ff20cf0dc163e195a58e11b" alt=""
Day seven:
I guess the photo I am most proud of is the macro of the conifer below. When I was walking through the forest I liked the texture of the conifer, and how the layers looked in the light, but I didn’t really know how to make it work in a photo. There was also limited space around the tree, it was difficult to move around it or move backwards. After some hovering around the tree I finally took two shots, this one and a landscape version, and I really liked how this one turned out.
This was also the day I finished Ektar and switched to monochrome.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43f57/43f57a05a3463cc1e685d11dcc3fd3b81d48f6a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fcbe/8fcbe887739c19bad90e16a06211c8b78eb72f49" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55413/554138b2e1ca81f0d8ad6b5b7d5254692d30d680" alt=""
Day eight:
I only liked one shot from today, it was difficult switching to black and white. I think the textures in the dead branch worked out well though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30bde/30bdedb8919dadb2d9de7ef096a922980f739537" alt=""
Day nine:
The last day, and I was blessed with some good light which made it easier to find tones for the monochrome images.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/559a1/559a1a0457c7967143484e881cd1d617cc12d5a5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db402/db4028a24c18c9b7768a6e7b7a3c018a7813d69d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52de0/52de067d490d08ddf9c57fbb26be5eee999f072d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c330/1c330f21b884c0283ebef27aa19716299f9c6457" alt=""
All in all I am pretty happy with the look of the film files. I think for woodland landscape Ektar is my favourite, I like the colors and I like how most of them have a good balance of subtlety without going bland. In some occasions the digital images worked better, but I am still struggling to make general statements about that. Or, I haven’t found a foolproof recipe yet!
Thanks for reading!
When I converted to digital, for work, I thought it would be easy to do conversion to monochrome in the comfort of my office. How wrong I was!
I stopped “seeing” the images with my inner monochrome eye and the digital never gave me the feelings I got from film and the instinctive natural camera controls were lost. If I want to work I choose colour or monochrome and stay with it. Once I drove across France with 20 rolls of each and made just one colour image and used all the monochrome film…
I can imagine. I still get insecure about the outcome of my film, so I mix it with digital (safer) and different film-types to spread the risk…